Ampache on OC 6
Locked
 
|
Is it only me, or the ampache feature is not working very well?
Cheers, Duarte _______________________________________________ Owncloud mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud |
|
|
There is no ampache feature, what are you referring to? The music app?
Also if you want ampache it might be best to set up ampache itself On 12/14/2013 04:00 PM, Duarte Velez Grilo wrote: > Is it only me, or the ampache feature is not working very well? > > Cheers, > Duarte > _______________________________________________ > Owncloud mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud _______________________________________________ Owncloud mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud |
|
|
Oh, my bad then. I was under the impression there was an ampache server
that we could connect to before. Am I wrong? On 14-12-2013 15:06, Bernhard Posselt wrote: > There is no ampache feature, what are you referring to? The music app? > > Also if you want ampache it might be best to set up ampache itself > > On 12/14/2013 04:00 PM, Duarte Velez Grilo wrote: >> Is it only me, or the ampache feature is not working very well? >> >> Cheers, >> Duarte >> _______________________________________________ >> Owncloud mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud > > _______________________________________________ > Owncloud mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud _______________________________________________ Owncloud mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud |
|
|
On 12/14/2013 04:16 PM, Duarte Velez Grilo wrote:
> Oh, my bad then. I was under the impression there was an ampache server > that we could connect to before. Am I wrong? No, you are not. I definitely remember, that I could use several ampache clients to connect to OC and listen to my music files stored in OC successfully (the clients were: Amarok on linux pc, and "Just player" and "Ampache provider" on an Android tablet). But that was several months ago, can't remember if it was 4.x or 5.0. But it used to work for sure, and I think that was a very nice and useful feature. It should not be dropped from OC. Yours: Laszlo > On 14-12-2013 15:06, Bernhard Posselt wrote: >> There is no ampache feature, what are you referring to? The music app? >> >> Also if you want ampache it might be best to set up ampache itself >> >> On 12/14/2013 04:00 PM, Duarte Velez Grilo wrote: >>> Is it only me, or the ampache feature is not working very well? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Duarte >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Owncloud mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Owncloud mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud > > _______________________________________________ > Owncloud mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud _______________________________________________ Owncloud mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud |
|
|
That feature was part of the music application, the music application
was a security risk and had no maintainer, thats why it was dropped. There is a new alpha release from a different maintainer on the appstore which you can try. I dont think it features ampache integration. Apart from that supporting the ampache API weakens your password security (by a lot) and allows the use of rainbow tables to crack your password. Just sayin. On 12/14/2013 04:30 PM, Tornóci László wrote: > On 12/14/2013 04:16 PM, Duarte Velez Grilo wrote: >> Oh, my bad then. I was under the impression there was an ampache server >> that we could connect to before. Am I wrong? > > No, you are not. I definitely remember, that I could use several > ampache clients to connect to OC and listen to my music files stored > in OC successfully (the clients were: Amarok on linux pc, and "Just > player" and "Ampache provider" on an Android tablet). But that was > several months ago, can't remember if it was 4.x or 5.0. But it used > to work for sure, and I think that was a very nice and useful feature. > It should not be dropped from OC. > > Yours: Laszlo > > >> On 14-12-2013 15:06, Bernhard Posselt wrote: >>> There is no ampache feature, what are you referring to? The music app? >>> >>> Also if you want ampache it might be best to set up ampache itself > >>> >>> On 12/14/2013 04:00 PM, Duarte Velez Grilo wrote: >>>> Is it only me, or the ampache feature is not working very well? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Duarte >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Owncloud mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Owncloud mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Owncloud mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud > > _______________________________________________ > Owncloud mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud _______________________________________________ Owncloud mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud |
|
|
On 12/14/2013 04:40 PM, Bernhard Posselt wrote:
> That feature was part of the music application, the music application > was a security risk and had no maintainer, thats why it was dropped. > There is a new alpha release from a different maintainer on the appstore > which you can try. I dont think it features ampache integration. > > Apart from that supporting the ampache API weakens your password > security (by a lot) and allows the use of rainbow tables to crack your > password. Just sayin. That's something I thought of myself, too. Is there a difference here between services that OC provides? There are quite a few services (webdav file, address book, calendar sync, mozilla sync). Are these services any better from the security point than the ampache API? The more services we use on different gadgets the more the security risk, that is clear. But is there any difference between services? Just curious. Yours: Laszlo > > On 12/14/2013 04:30 PM, Tornóci László wrote: >> On 12/14/2013 04:16 PM, Duarte Velez Grilo wrote: >>> Oh, my bad then. I was under the impression there was an ampache server >>> that we could connect to before. Am I wrong? >> >> No, you are not. I definitely remember, that I could use several >> ampache clients to connect to OC and listen to my music files stored >> in OC successfully (the clients were: Amarok on linux pc, and "Just >> player" and "Ampache provider" on an Android tablet). But that was >> several months ago, can't remember if it was 4.x or 5.0. But it used >> to work for sure, and I think that was a very nice and useful feature. >> It should not be dropped from OC. >> >> Yours: Laszlo >> >> _______________________________________________ Owncloud mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud |
|
|
On Saturday 14 December 2013 17:20:22 Tornóci László wrote:
> On 12/14/2013 04:40 PM, Bernhard Posselt wrote: > > That feature was part of the music application, the music application > > was a security risk and had no maintainer, thats why it was dropped. > > There is a new alpha release from a different maintainer on the appstore > > which you can try. I dont think it features ampache integration. > > > > Apart from that supporting the ampache API weakens your password > > security (by a lot) and allows the use of rainbow tables to crack your > > password. Just sayin. > > That's something I thought of myself, too. Is there a difference here > between services that OC provides? There are quite a few services > (webdav file, address book, calendar sync, mozilla sync). Are these > services any better from the security point than the ampache API? The > more services we use on different gadgets the more the security risk, > that is clear. But is there any difference between services? Just curious. > > Yours: Laszlo As far as I know ampache is an exception since ampache requires us to store the sha256 hash of the password, for things like cal/card/webdav we can choose our own password storage format (bcrypt) - Robin Appelman _______________________________________________ Owncloud mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud |
|
|
In reply to this post by Tornóci László
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 webDav and CalDav/CardDav use normal HTTP iirc, HTTP basic auth. If this is done over SSL it is encrypted. The only problem there could be if someone manages to do a Man in the Middle attack which allows him to grab your password. That would require him to have a valid Cert for your domain though. If you check the fingerprint (or if the program does this) its close to impossible to do this. So I'd argue: As long as you can be sure that the SSL Cert is your own Cert, its way saver. On 12/14/2013 05:20 PM, Tornóci László wrote: > On 12/14/2013 04:40 PM, Bernhard Posselt wrote: >> That feature was part of the music application, the music application >> was a security risk and had no maintainer, thats why it was dropped. >> There is a new alpha release from a different maintainer on the appstore >> which you can try. I dont think it features ampache integration. >> >> Apart from that supporting the ampache API weakens your password >> security (by a lot) and allows the use of rainbow tables to crack your >> password. Just sayin. > > That's something I thought of myself, too. Is there a difference here (webdav file, address book, calendar sync, mozilla sync). Are these services any better from the security point than the ampache API? The more services we use on different gadgets the more the security risk, that is clear. But is there any difference between services? Just curious. > > Yours: Laszlo >> >> On 12/14/2013 04:30 PM, Tornóci László wrote: >>> On 12/14/2013 04:16 PM, Duarte Velez Grilo wrote: >>>> Oh, my bad then. I was under the impression there was an ampache server >>>> that we could connect to before. Am I wrong? >>> >>> No, you are not. I definitely remember, that I could use several >>> ampache clients to connect to OC and listen to my music files stored >>> in OC successfully (the clients were: Amarok on linux pc, and "Just >>> player" and "Ampache provider" on an Android tablet). But that was >>> several months ago, can't remember if it was 4.x or 5.0. But it used >>> to work for sure, and I think that was a very nice and useful feature. >>> It should not be dropped from OC. >>> >>> Yours: Laszlo >>> >>> > > _______________________________________________ > Owncloud mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSrOaDAAoJEC7c8FtZDzUzXyIP/RJ2jLVyFJ6ammv5CL9o9aM/ 6kFBf03tx1BYGQpo3DC1ynDRx4cNfHtELejrZWBx4GObWL8uXKFtWj+EiJthT7rC tYfer/4Iv/lGr+CQp++OSwDKbiR9SkmZ94DF01M40lVUwCcvS6J6in9gbEUYjD7N /PrNAPNBDDSssbpcvJkUS/5rcQL7EtoYKgiUR6y1VaHRRr7AoK+LOJKd/zyjYLw9 tIyBkrWXDa7tt42XRZfKesZUwmtYq8pe+2RAWQ0hX7SSO4BG9LypDVR/VvGwOpg/ EBtIjrhxc2WbMWGijiG9ewIl0Ei9TuDDnQvTe+0yNatHUrZ9F1THCNxSyiNfW2Lh fksAohF6Fmqv4O9Np6h8f1MPD/w38FrAK3yUicaetbcBpw6BW7juyFqEYbJdrDt3 YM7TuLfpnzya0oTyCd1GD+NRDmXUMW4WHF4piw4t32nXso1lWzjkBDe95EkXfXqW 9wwtBgELYCi/v8vJy4pDD32jcUvteON9WH9YeYuooJYEEXX/MaStReXI6uKHxEii bLoMWyfAi/qTPnMHL0dFgmN6ucucshTh6PjIVr+vZVXwB4xPA2oOwxIXg+3nQsX+ PgWyQ0lKDfR9bQw5yTl218pUfnt8pjATCqmIMM+NRLbfFCzovuAHBEuZdLA2o2Rz O9wq1Zrd+iUVl1YdRoZh =HgJF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Owncloud mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud |
«
Return to Users
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |